Schools · Case study
Real results from a school running EPC
A mid-size secondary school ran the EPC Tri-Point Model across a 12-week programme: weekly sessions, daily micro-routines, and staff-supported reinforcement. It was built to improve student stability, reduce behavioural incidents, and strengthen daily consistency. These are the school's real, measured figures — published with the school's permission.
Published with the school's consent. Results are group-level only — no individual student's data is shared.
The figures
Baseline stability score
48/60
Level 2 · Stable at the start of the programme
Pressure score before EPC
72
High pressure across the cohort before the programme
Action consistency
55%
Of students used EPC routines regularly during the programme
Behaviour incidents
−28%
Reduction in behaviour incidents after EPC implementation
Attendance
+2.3%
Improvement in overall attendance
Where the cohort started
A baseline stability score of 48/60 puts the group at Level 2 · Stable — but with a pressure score of 72, the cohort was carrying high pressure into every school day. EPC targets the pressure, not the students.
Where the behaviour change showed
The 28% reduction was visible across classroom disruptions, corridor behaviour, and social-pressure-related incidents. Staff reported calmer transitions, fewer escalations, and improved self-regulation among participating students.
What moved attendance
The +2.3% attendance improvement reflected better morning readiness, reduced avoidance behaviours, and stronger daily consistency from students using EPC routines.
Teacher feedback
“Students were noticeably calmer, more focused, and more consistent in their routines.”
What the programme involved
- · The EPC Scan to establish each group's baseline stability and pressure
- · Weekly EPC sessions across the 12-week programme
- · Daily micro-routines: baseline check-in, pressure tags, stabilising actions
- · Staff-supported reinforcement in the classroom
Run this in your school
Every school is different — the cohort, the timetable and the pressures. The starting point is the same either way: scan the group, see where the pressure sits, and build the daily stability cycle around it.